ISB Security Solutions
Loading
ISB Security Solutions
Loading
Features
ISB Security Platform is built as a modular operational system. Capabilities are grouped by domain but share the same organizational, object, access and audit context.
Capabilities are shown by development stage: Implemented foundation · Active development · Planned · Future direction.
Reporting
From field observation to finalized record. Specific Report and AI-assisted Specific Report form the current foundation.
Report lifecycle
Targeted operational reports with structured fields.
Workflow · Observation → finalized record · Connected · Objects, Personnel
Draft structuring from field input under mandatory human review.
MVP foundation
Shift and daily operational summaries.
Categorized incident registration with context.
Damage registration with evidence support.
Accident documentation workflows.
Evidence attached to reports.
Field voice capture for later processing.
Formal acknowledgment support.
Supervisory review before finalization.
Version and change visibility.
Organizations & Customers
One security provider may manage several customers while maintaining separate operational context.
Organization
→ Customer
→ Objects
→ Requirements
→ Operational context
Organization-level configuration.
Client records linked to objects and services.
Tenant-aware data boundaries between organizations.
Controlled client visibility into relevant operations.
Operational and emergency contacts.
Service requirements linked to sites.
Objects & Locations
From customer and object down to checkpoint and asset — each level can carry operational context.
Customer
└ Object · instructions · risks · contacts · documents
└ Building / Floor / Zone · access · patrol context
└ Room / Post · assignment instructions
└ Checkpoint · verification
└ Asset · equipment
Site and building structure.
Fine-grained location hierarchy.
Patrol and inspection points.
Equipment and resource registration.
Object-level emergency context.
Object-linked documentation.
Historical operational context per object.
Site-specific instructions and risk notes.
Object-linked escalation paths.
Route definitions across checkpoints.
Object-linked operational resources.
Personnel
Personnel connect to roles, qualifications and assignments — not isolated HR profiles.
Assignment model
Account and identity foundations.
Operational personnel context.
Least-privilege access scopes.
Qualification tracking for assignments.
Duty availability context.
Shift planning foundations.
Team structure for operational coordination.
Link personnel to objects and shifts.
Operations
Assignments, patrols, checkpoints, escalations and notifications. Realtime and offline are architecture directions — not claimed as fully released.
Operational flow
Workflow and escalation notices.
Operational task assignment and tracking.
Patrol execution against routes and objects.
Confirm or exception at checkpoints.
Structured escalation handling.
Architecture for live operational status.
Not fully released
Field workflows without continuous connectivity.
Architecture direction
Field-oriented interface foundations.
Security & Governance
Designed around identity, role, tenant and action context. Architecture supports row-level data controls where relevant.
Identity → Role → Tenant → Data scope → Action → Audit
Permission scopes by operational role.
Architecture supports row-level data controls.
Coverage expanding
Traceable critical actions and approvals.
Controlled storage architecture.
Tenant-aware organizational boundaries.
Authenticated user access model.
Controlled external access foundations.
History of critical configuration and record changes.
Intelligence
AI assists structure and clarity. Pattern analysis and recommendations remain staged. No autonomous operational decisions.
Intelligence chain
AI-assisted report drafting under human review.
Structured views over operational data.
Pattern support across operational records.
Signal support for operational risk review.
Recommendation layer for human review.
Workforce and operations insight direction.
Team composition support direction.
Status model
Implemented foundation — current architectural and workflow baseline.
Active development — work in progress, not full product claim.
Planned — intended expansion, subject to change.
Future direction — longer-term ambition, not availability.